• Home
  • About 404TS
  • Contact

404 Tech Support

Where IT Help is Found

  • Articles
    • Code
    • Entertainment
    • Going Green
    • Hardware, Gadgets, and Products
    • Management
    • Network
    • News
    • Operating Systems
    • Security and Privacy
    • Software
    • System Administration
    • Talking Points
    • Tech Solutions
    • Web
    • Webmaster
  • Reviews
  • Media
    • Infographics
    • Videos
  • Tech Events
  • Tools
    • How do I find my IP address?
    • Browser and plugin tests
  • Get a Technical Consultation
You are here: Home / Articles / Management / Should you really accelerate to a 2-year PC refresh cycle?

Should you really accelerate to a 2-year PC refresh cycle?

2014-08-07 by Jason

Intel promoted an industry analysts’ report that calls the 3-4 year upgrade cycle of PCs a fallacy and pushes for a 2-year refresh cycle. The report “Replacing Enterprise PCs: The Fallacy of the 3-4 Year Replacement Cycle” (PDF) is compiled by J. Gold Associates, LLC and was reposted by Intel yesterday.

My initial reaction is to state the obvious in defense: Of course Intel wants to promote buying more computers (with Intel processors, of course) and buying them more frequently. While that might be best for their shareholders, is it best for your organization? It is going to be hard to argue against an industry analyst that has quantified user productivity and broken it down into average yearly savings, ROI, and percentage of employee costs. While I might not be able to win the argument, which I do not think is all wrong, I instead aim to poke a few holes in it with the hope that it will make people pause and think if they really need to up their PC refresh cycle.

From my professional experience and working with various clients, I know a significant portion of organizations are still establishing a PC refresh program. There is certainly merit to a refresh cycle and figuring out how long it needs to be will be up to the individual organization and how they order computers. If you buy a computer to start out with the latest generation Core i7 processors and a significant amount of RAM, that computer should continue to meet your needs longer than if you buy all of your computers with the previous generation Core i3 processors and only enough RAM to meet the minimum system requirements of your operating system.

The report states:

“Common industry practice says that enterprise PCs should be replaced on a 3-4 year cycle, when the costs of maintaining the PC outweigh the cost of replacing it. Indeed, this has been commonplace for many years, and companies still accept this as fact. However, is this model still valid in the modern age? Does it still make sense for companies to wait for an extended period of time in an era of rapid chip technology improvement, cloud-based systems and consumer-driven technology upgrade cycles? Our analysis indicates a significant ROI can be achieved by upgrading more often, despite the costs involved in migrating users to new systems….”

At the same time you hear of Moore’s law slowing down, the industry analyst wants to claim an era of rapid chip technology? Intel’s 4th generation processor was a moderate improvement but focused a lot of power management. For laptops and other battery-powered mobile devices, that can make a difference to productivity but for desktops it would not be that noticeable.

The increase of cloud-based systems actually hurts the argument of a faster refresh cycle, so I’m not sure why it’s included. If you are offloading more processing to servers, the desktop does not need to be as powerful or have as many resources. Virtual desktop clients are expected to have an 8-10 year life cycle because the heavy lifting is done on the server. As more applications become Software-As-A-Service and the desktop becomes a glorified web browser, how would a newer processor and more RAM make a difference? The report does distinguish that the productivity gained by a newer PC would vary by role, so the 3D designer might see more improvements than the data-entry clerk.

“Enterprises should establish a PC refresh program that is not based on ‘old thinking’ industry practices established many years ago,” says Jack Gold, president of J.Gold Associates, LLC. “We strongly recommend companies immediately move to a refresh cycle of two years for their corporate PCs. The increased levels of productivity available from newer devices offer both a substantial ROI of 500-1000 percent as well as provide for a more efficient workforce, allowing organizations to do more with the resources they currently have.” The report from Jack Gold notes that the cost of a new machine is considerably less today, on a device to employee expense ratio, than it was a decade ago when many of the recommendations were established. Organizations must look at the negative cost implications of keeping older devices past their prime.

While having older equipment might dampen your recruiting efforts or disappoint employees by not having the latest and greatest, the most important thing is that it will still allow them to complete their jobs efficiently. We are talking about having 3-4 year old computers instead of 2 year old computers. Most manufacturers provide a 3-year warranty as their default offering.

The take-aways from reading the report should be that a broad recommendation from an industry analyst should spur thinking before action. A 2 year refresh cycle could be considered for top users but should not dictate policy. An organization’s IT should evaluate the warranty coverage, budget/costs, productivity, hardware improvements, and technology needs to determine the refresh cycle they can support and where they will gain productivity improvements. Having a refresh cycle can insulate a business from unexpected expenses while taking advantage of technology improvements in a measured way. I would still recommend a 3-4 year refresh cycle for my clients and make exceptions to it, not the rule. This clearly seems like a means to push more sales while being of minimal benefit to the purchasing enterprise.

Filed Under: Management, Talking Points

Trending

  • Dell promotes the hybrid cloud
    In Infographics
  • SanDisk Dual drive bridges USB Type-A and Type-C
    In Hardware, Gadgets, and Products
  • Malwarebytes 3.0 released
    In Security and Privacy, Software

Latest Media Posts

Find Out Where To Download SNES ROMs

Find Out Where To Download SNES ROMs

Multifunctional Video Conversion Tools – Wondershare Video Converter

Multifunctional Video Conversion Tools – Wondershare Video Converter

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Today Week Month All
  • SOLVED: “This modification is not allowed because the selection is locked.” SOLVED: "This modification is not allowed because the selection is locked."
  • Increase IIS Private Memory Limit to improve WSUS availability Increase IIS Private Memory Limit to improve WSUS availability
  • What is the AllJoyn Router Service on Windows 10? What is the AllJoyn Router Service on Windows 10?
  • How to ‘Unblock’ multiple files at a time with PowerShell How to 'Unblock' multiple files at a time with PowerShell
  • Troubleshooting time synchronization for domain-joined computers Troubleshooting time synchronization for domain-joined computers
  • 3d rendering circuit cloud for cloud computing technology What Is An Ellucian Migration And Is It Important?
  • Remote monitoring of text messages on a mobile device Remote monitoring of text messages on a mobile device
  • ​Great Tech Tips For Remote Workers ​Great Tech Tips For Remote Workers
  • Ideas That Will Free up MacBook Hard Drive Ideas That Will Free up MacBook Hard Drive
  • Advantages Of Video Conferencing For Small Businesses Advantages Of Video Conferencing For Small Businesses
Ajax spinner

Elevator Pitch

404 Tech Support documents solutions to IT problems, shares worthwhile software and websites, and reviews hardware, consumer electronics, and technology-related books.

Subscribe to 404TS articles by email.

Recent Posts

  • What Is An Ellucian Migration And Is It Important?
  • Remote monitoring of text messages on a mobile device
  • ​Great Tech Tips For Remote Workers

Search

FTC Disclaimer

404TechSupport is an Amazon.com affiliate; when you click on an Amazon link from 404TS, the site gets a cut of the proceeds from whatever you buy. This site also uses Skimlinks for smart monetization of other affiliate links.
Use of this site requires displaying and viewing ads as they are presented.

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in